8600 Rockville Pike Thus, the heterogeneity of roles affected by editors shows their coordinating role in the process, due to what Reinhart and Schendzielorz have called the administrative practices of peer review. Receive industry news, advice from editors & gallerists, exclusive deadlines, entry to the best images occasions and more on a weekly basis. Editorial decision making at Nature Genetics. Peer review at scholarly journals, however, does also have a function in protecting scientific autonomy by safeguarding quality. Valuable insights were gained from the categorization of events into the process element categories. Many researchers, reviewers and editors do have opinions about the roles and responsibilities of both editors and reviewers (Glonti et al., 2019), some of which contradict each other (Glonti et al., 2019, p.1). Batagelj V., Ferligoj A., Squazzoni F. (2017). Internet Explorer). If an appeal merits further consideration, the editors may send the authors' response or the revised paper to one or more reviewers, or they may ask one reviewer to comment on the concerns raised by another reviewer. This is partly caused by several automated steps present in the process, which can take only one second to happen. As editors, our aim is to send you a decision that will give you the best advice we can about how to move forward to get your work published. Learn more. Some of these activities, formerly external to the normal administrative editorial work, may now be automated by the infrastructure, leading to novel control technologies which may also put the editorial role under stronger pressure. ~. The editor contacts the author with the decision.